Moving Urology Prescription tramadol Unsecured debt Reduce debt Finasteride Tramadol free shipping Generic ultram Casino betting Debt management Spyware Credit card debt help Viagra pill Parts Consolidating debt Oxycontin Tramadol 50mg Slot machine gambling Cialis online pharmacy Zyban Buy xanax Car insurance california Quick payday loan Cialis Meridia Pain Relief Dermatologist Bank foreclosure Full tilt poker bonus Buy paxil Buy carisoprodol Home pc repair Day care Suboxone Facebook Out Sertraline Unsecured personal loan Online bingo site Atenolol Hydrocodone Celexa Cancer treatment clinic Free credit report Dating site Investing Weather Best online casino site Airlines Adultfriendfinder Home health Debt reduction Get tramadol Prozac Buy levitra Phentermine prices Tretinoin Cheap acomplia Vets Pokerstars 

Why newspapers online = fail

adam| June 5, 2008 9:32 am

At the Publishing 2.0, Scott Karp has a great article what newspapers still don’t understand about the web. It’s a fantastic read!

Here’s an idea for newspaper website homepages — just a search box and a list of blogs. Seriously. Instead of putting all the web-native content and publishing in the blog ghetto, like NYTimes.com does, why not make that the WHOLE site? (I mean seriously, having a blog section on the website is like having a section in the paper for 14 column inch stories.)

It’s like newspapers on the web as saying: here’s all the static stuff we produced for the paper — you want all of our dynamic web innovation? Oh, that’s downstairs, in the back room. Knock twice before you enter.

It’s a shame — so much marginalized value.

I bet I could stop going to the New York Times site entirely and just subscribe to all of their blog RSS feeds, and still get all the news, but in a web-native format, with data and LINKS.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

No Responses to “Why newspapers online = fail”

Care to comment?

You must be logged in to post a comment.